gravity waves, the big bang, and my unshakable faith

big bang, gravity waves, creationism, creationist, genesis

Written by Dan King

Christ-follower. husband. father. author of the unlikely missionary: from pew-warmer to poverty-fighter. co-author of activist faith: from him and for him. director of family ministry at st. edward's episcopal church. president of fistbump media, llc.

March 18, 2014

This post is probably going to get some people mad at me.

I just noticed that Big Bang is a trending conversation on Facebook, and saw some really fascinating articles about how astronomers believe they’ve finally proven the Big Bang Theory. I don’t really fully understand the science myself. And I’m not going to pretend to say that I know enough to argue against it. Essentially, they’ve found some gravity waves that prove the rapid expansion of the Universe in the first few nanoseconds after the Big Bang. It’s being called one of the greatest discoveries of our time, and many are already calling it worthy of a Nobel Prize.

So science now says that the Big Bang is no longer a theory. It’s a fact. And I know that this will certainly shake up much of the religious community. It’s also providing anti-creationists an opportunity to give Christians a giant, “na-na, na-na, boo-boo, stick your head in doo-doo!”


But here’s the big question, and I don’t believe science can answer this one definitively.

Does proving the Big Bang, or evolution, or any other theory disprove the existence of God?


It certainly does not.

Here’s the deal. Even if the Big Bang is a fact, there’s still the question of what caused it to happen. And there’s still the question about what’s on the other side of this Universe (no matter how big or small it’s ever been).

And even for the Creationists, there’s division between people who hold to a literal six-day Creation, and others who believe that the term “day” doesn’t necessarily refer to a 24-hour period. And both sides have valid points.

The truth is that we don’t really know for sure. We can’t know. None of us were there. There are no human eye-witnesses who documented the whole thing. It would be nice if we had God’s Instagram account to check out for the selfies He might have taken while working on something so awesome. But we don’t.

One thing I try to remember when I see reports like this is that science is merely observing and reporting on what they see in the known, physical Universe. These observations can tell us a great deal about the world around us, and Christian need to be careful when it comes to selectively disputing what trained professionals have witnessed. We don’t dispute gravity. We don’t dispute the atom. We don’t dispute the human genome. In all of these cases, scientists merely report what already exists. They’re making observations.

It’s also important to point out that the Bible was never intended to be a science book. It’s not trying to present a different, opposing scientific view. Rather, it answers a different question. One about purpose. And the question of purpose is one that science can’t answer. Therefore, I hardly see them in conflict with one another.

Our issue comes when we attempt to interpret the Bible, particularly with ideas such as Creation. We must ALWAYS remember that even though the Bible is God’s Word FOR us, it’s not God’s Word TO us. What I mean is that the texts were first written to a people in a VERY different time, culture, place, language, etc. John Walton points out in The Lost World of Genesis One that the Creation story was written with an ancient understanding of cosmology. And in order for us to understand God’s Message to US, we must first understand God’s Message to THEM (the original, ancient audience). That’s rule #1 of good exegesis.

I’m not trying to take a strong position right here, right now about which idea I believe is the correct one. Because the bottom line is…

i. don’t. know.

I wasn’t there. And all I can honestly do is recognize the possibility that it all could have happened very differently than what I could hope or imagine (or even scientifically prove). But I do still believe that God is real. Why? Because of my own testimony/witness of what He’s done in my life. He’s changed me. He’s given me purpose and meaning. He’s made me a better inhabitant of this Universe. I’ve seen and experienced what He can do with a life devoted to Him.

That’s why no discovery science could ever make will shake my faith in God. If anything, it only makes me appreciate the magnitude of what He’s done.

big bang


  1. pastordt

    I love this, Dan. We are not God and we simply do not have all the answers. I love what you’re saying here, Dan. Nice job.

    • Dan King

      thanks diana! that’s always been one thing i’ve struggled with, people stating that they know ALL of the answers beyond the shadow of doubt. it’s just not possible. and it only brings division.

  2. Guest

    I’m my own God. 🙂 Good luck shaking my faith.

    • Dan King

      And that must take a lot of faith! It stinks that you decided to post anonymously…. I’ve never met a mere man capable of creating the entire Universe!

  3. Foxtrot

    Very well said, Dan. I’m one who believes that science (external knowledge) and religion (internal knowledge) are not necessarily opposed, but two sides of an endeavor to understand the whole of the universe (God’s creation) in its grandeur. It’s so amazing how the description given by the Bible account so closely resembles the sequence of events we understand of the process of Creation from science. I say, Let There Be Light!

    • Dan King

      thanks! you nailed it! they answer different questions, and aren’t really in conflict. i couldn’t imagine reading the Bible in science class, but if I go down that road, science has even identified some pretty uncanny wisdom recorded in Bible times… like food restrictions that protect people from diseases that we can only know about with modern technologies that see microscopic qualities… things they couldn’t have known…

  4. Andrew Bauserman

    Dan – I appreciate your thoughtful and humble tone…

    Re: “science is merely observing and reporting on what they see in the known, physical Universe”

    “[W]hat may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.”

    Romans 1:19-20

    What science is “merely observing and reporting” is nothing short of the Glory of God! Christians should be very careful, humble and reverent—not so much toward the scientist as toward the nature of creation being revealed. Nothing scientists “discover” comes as a surprise to God; and to the degree that nature may be misunderstood or misinterpreted by science, further exploration will assuredly bring clarification, as it has for centuries.

    And every bit of it, of the revelation of God’s Glory through creation, is intended by God to lead us to worship!

    • Dan King

      Totally agree! Especially what you say about the purpose of that revelation at the end… to lead us to worship.That’s good, and spot on! #fistbump


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

gravity waves, the big bang, and my unshakable faith

by Dan King time to read: 4 min