by Greg Glatz
Chapter 3 of
Gibbons notes that he’s heard the good Samaritan story countless times and that he understood its meaning as “be kind to my neighbor, and that my neighbor is somebody who is basically a lot like me, but in need in some way” (emphasis mine). I wasn’t sure what to make of that statement. I’ve been in evangelical churches for nearly 30 years. I’ve heard a lot of sermons on this parable. Most of them weren’t that good … including the ones I preached. But I don’t think any preacher implied that I only help people who are basically like me.
Gibbons does eventually land on the point of the parable: “Much to the dismay of Jesus’ Jewish audience, the hero of the story is a person they despised”. Bullseye! I think this statement could have set the direction for the remainder of Chapter 3. I would have loved to see Gibbons tell us how we find Jesus in “the least of these,” a point made incredibly clear in Greg Paul’s and Rick McKinley’s .
Instead, Gibbons presents a theology of discomfort that suggests we abandon the mega-church mantra of homogeneous people groups and reach out to people of mixed races, other races, and other socio-economic strata. I don’t disagree with his determination to embrace diversity. And I applaud his repudiation of the attractional methodology of his church in the 1980’s/90’s. (Referring to former days, Gibbons writes: “We became really good at producing large-screen extravaganzas that rival network television, complete with cutting-edge programming, free donuts, cushy seating, welcome teams, parking, free wireless, and ATMs in the foyer.”)
I just wish Gibbons had gone one step further. I wish he had gone where Jesus went in the parable of the Good Samaritan. It is the Samaritans of this world – the outcasts, the rejects, the insufficient and the insignificant – who show us what it means to be a neighbor. We don’t minister to them, with our delusions of grandeur and grandiosity. They minister to us. That’s the scandal of the cross: the one who had “nothing in his appearance that we should desire him” (Isaiah 53:2) was actually everything we ever needed.
So what would it mean to let the Samaritans take over the church? What would it mean to let them preach the sermons, lead the councils, design the worship, heal the sick, care for the widows and orphans, and welcome the strangers? I’m wondering if the answer to that question might be one of the keys to understanding the meaning of liquid leadership in the 21st century.
About the author:
Greg Glatz is a Jesus-lovin’, guitar-rockin’, Camaro-drivin’ Baptist preacher who hosts the GODTALK Radio Show on CJOB 68 — radio’s weirdest, wildest talk radio show. An ordained minister with a 16-year track record as the lead pastor of Central Baptist Church, Greg also plays lead guitar for the band GOOD, the Royal Unruh Band, and the B-Side Apostles with CJOB morning host Larry Updike. In his spare time, the Preacha indulges his love for high-speed Mac computers by freelancing in audio production and hand-coded web and database design.